Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council adopts consistency statement and approves Martin Street zoning amendment after applicant’s revised conditions

Raleigh City Council · June 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Raleigh City Council voted unanimously to adopt a consistency statement dated 06/02/2026 and approve zoning amendment ZO-126 (Martin Street) after staff and the applicant described revised conditions and the Historic Development Commission concerns.

The Raleigh City Council on June 2 voted to adopt the recommended consistency statement dated 06/02/2026 and approve zoning amendment ZO‑126, a rezoning affecting parcels on the south side of Martin Street (DX‑20 downtown mixed-use district).

Planning staff summarized revisions to the applicant’s conditions, highlighting new language intended to retain upper‑story fenestration, exterior masonry and rough openings on the prominent Martin Street facade. Colette Kinane of planning and development, who reviewed the changes with the historic-preservation perspective, said the revisions addressed many concerns but did not preserve masonry openings along the alleyway and Commerce Place — an outcome the Raleigh Historic Development Commission had hoped to include.

Jamie Schwadler, representing the applicant and with Parker Poe (31 Fayetteville Street), said the conditions were voluntarily proffered and reflected a compromise between preserving prominent historic facades and allowing modernization on secondary elevations. "We've struck the balance that we feel is appropriate here," Schwadler said.

A council member moved to adopt the proposed consistency statement dated 06/02/2026 and approve the zoning amendment as described in the agenda materials; the motion was seconded and carried unanimously.

Provenance: The rezoning presentation, applicant remarks and council motion appear in the transcript between SEG 631 and SEG 761.