Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ems Fire Transition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Officials say EMS/fire merger is on track; commissioners press for clear retiree 401(k) calculations
Summary
County leaders told commissioners the EMS/fire service transition is largely complete and protections in the MOU carry into the legal agreement; commissioners pressed staff on whether retirees will be made financially "whole" and asked for individualized actuarial calculations for about eight impacted employees.
County staff told the Board of Commissioners on June 1 that the transition of an EMS and fire nonprofit into county service is largely complete and that protections in the earlier memorandum of understanding (MOU) were carried forward into a finalized legal agreement.
"The same, your guidance document of the MOU carries over to the agreement," said Chief Grayson, describing the transition team's work and saying most tasks are either complete or in motion.
Commissioners pressed staff about employee protections and the treatment of retirees who are close to retirement. One commissioner asked whether the no-change-in-service term in the MOU had been shortened from 12 months to six months in the final agreement; Chief Grayson said he was not aware of any such discussion and offered to review the wording with legal staff.
Deputy county staff and managers outlined an option they said would "make employees whole" for retirement-related contributions: individualized actuarial calculations and, for employees who retire within five years of the merger effective date, a potential lump-sum contribution to make up the difference between what employees would have received from the nonprofit and the county retirement arrangements. Staff said the county cannot replicate the county employer contribution to the local government retirement system but can reimburse employees for their own prior contributions plus interest.
"That calculation will be different for each person and then it will also depend on what they were contributing before," the deputy manager said, adding the list included roughly eight employees who meet the criteria.
The board asked staff to continue meetings with legal and HR to confirm wording, actuarial calculations and a schedule for getting individualized information to affected employees. No formal policy change was voted on at the meeting; commissioners directed staff to follow up and produce the requested calculations and communications.
The discussion was framed as implementation planning rather than a final decision; the board later went into closed session on separate personnel and litigation matters.
