Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Gis topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners table $825,000 GIS contract after staff flags large price increase
Summary
Lee County commissioners on June 2 tabled a single-source, three-year enterprise GIS contract after staff reported an increase to $825,000 (from roughly $340,000 in 2017) and said about half the additional cost is for new services; staff was directed to negotiate and return with alternatives.
The Lee County Board of County Commissioners voted June 2 to table a single-source, three-year enterprise GIS contract and directed staff to seek better pricing and alternatives before the board considers approval.
Commissioner Hammond asked staff to pause the item and negotiate with the vendor after noting an apparent 42% price increase compared with the prior contract. "Anytime I see a price increase that big, I have to dig into it," Hammond said, and moved to direct staff to return with revised pricing options.
Ashley Mason, speaking for county staff, said the vendor relationship began in 2017 at about $340,000 and that the current proposal brings the annual price to about "$825,000 for this year." Mason explained roughly half the increase is attributable to added products and services, including ArcGIS Velocity and SiteScan, meant to consolidate public-safety and other functions into the platform. "Esri is very much like, the Microsoft of the business," Mason said, explaining limited room to negotiate and that the county engaged Gartner to validate pricing.
Commissioners questioned whether there are comparable alternatives and whether the public-safety and website integrations would be more costly to replace. Staff said migrating to a different vendor would require a lengthy, potentially more expensive process and that the county's GIS manager had negotiated previously but received a "polite, no thank you" when pressing the vendor. Several commissioners said they still wanted staff to press for better terms and, if necessary, prepare a competitive solicitation; the motion to table and direct staff carried with no objections.
Staff will return the item to the board with negotiation results or alternative procurement options.
