Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Nursing Home Survey topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Becky DeBoer and residents urge Madison County to include former nursing staff in survey

Madison County Board of Commissioners ยท March 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Madison County commissioners meeting, registered nurse Becky DeBoer and residents said a county-funded third-party survey of a local nursing facility is incomplete because it interviews only current employees; they asked the county to direct the contractor to include former staff for candid exit perspectives.

Becky DeBoer, a registered nurse, told the Madison County Board of Commissioners that the county's independent survey of a local nursing facility is not comprehensive because it is interviewing only current employees and not former staff. "It has come to my attention that you're only talking to current employees. Why? Why do you not wanna know why these other people left?" DeBoer said.

DeBoer said exit interviews are rarely comprehensive and that former employees need anonymity to share candid reasons for leaving. She listed possible causes โ€” wages, workplace environment, leadership โ€” and said the county would not discover them without broad outreach to past staff. "I am very disappointed that you're not talking to people who have left," she said.

Cassie Marsh, identified in the transcript as a resident commenter, echoed DeBoer: "Very, very disappointed that the past employees are not getting their chance to say what happened and why they left the facility. You should direct how it should be done so that everybody has a voice."

A county committee member responded that the commission had left methodology decisions to the contracted survey company to avoid influencing the process and that staff and the administrator had not directed the contractor. The committee member said the county is "trying to figure out the best way forward" and described the current approach as an attempt to balance input from satisfied and dissatisfied employees.

The public commentary did not result in a formal vote or an immediate change in the survey process during the meeting. Commissioners and staff said they would review the contractor's approach and the survey company's procedures; No formal direction to amend the contractor's scope was recorded in the transcript excerpt.

The county did not provide a final timeline in the meeting transcript for any change to the contractor's interview scope.