Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Emergency Medical Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Elmore offers dynamic EMS-pricing proposal; Morristown board says $42,500 estimate falls short

Select Board of the Town of Morristown · December 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Dec. 8 Morristown Select Board meeting, Elmore presented a two-part EMS pricing model — service (utilization) and capital (per capita) — and estimated about $42,500 for FY26–27. Board members said that number does not reflect Morristowns readiness costs and asked Elmore to return with a counterproposal before the towns budget deadline.

George Press of Elmore presented a two-part pricing proposal for continuing EMS support to Morristown, telling the board the model separates a service component tied to call volume from a capital component tied to per-capita shares. "The numbers move, and I'll round it. $42,500," Press said, describing the figure as a rough, dynamic estimate for FY26–27.

The proposal calls for a three-year rolling average of calls to determine the service share and a per-capita metric for capital contributions. Press illustrated the approach with an example that used Elmores historical call counts (24 average calls vs. Morristowns 904) to get a ~2.7% share and a service-component calculation of about $27,228, with a capital share around $15,000.

Select Board members pushed back on whether the sum would fairly cover Morristowns preparedness costs. Chair McNell noted a quick calculation dividing the towns operating budget across Morristown and Elmore populations produced "about $154 a person," which board members said implies a much larger fair share for Elmore than the $42,500 proposal. Multiple board members argued readiness — staffing two ambulances, maintaining response capacity year-round — is not just a per-call cost and should not be shifted nearly entirely onto Morristown taxpayers.

Board members and the Elmore delegation agreed neither side wanted rushed or unfair terms. An Elmore select-board representative urged Morristown to come back with a counterproposal and said Elmore would also consider revising its number; both sides acknowledged tight timing because Morristown needs a number for its own budget process within days. The board asked that town administration coordinate follow-up and suggested an executive session later in the week if needed.

What happens next: Elmore will return with revised numbers or a counterproposal; Morristown administration will coordinate the details and the Select Board emphasized the need for a timely number because of pending budget deadlines.