Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Interim Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hooper staff outlines interim budget; council to consider utility rate changes and reserve $128,000 in property-tax revenue
Summary
City staff said an interim budget is needed to operate from July 1 until the official budget and state-approved tax rate are finalized; the packet also includes proposed sewer, garbage and stormwater rate changes, and council members asked for clarification on attorney fees and public notice.
A staff member told the Hooper City Council that the city must adopt an interim budget to allow operations to continue from July 1 until the official budget and property-tax rate are approved by the state. "We are adopting an interim budget that will allow us to operate from July 1 until the official budget's approved," the staff member said, and added the city cannot count an anticipated $128,000 in additional property-tax revenue as an expense in the interim budget.
Why it matters: without an interim budget, the city would lack a lawful spending plan at the start of the fiscal year. The staff member said the interim budget is intended to prevent the city from spending money on the assumption that a tax increase will be approved, and that the amount being held in reserve will be carried into the final budget if unused.
Council members asked about several details in the packet. One member asked whether the addition of a "third attorney" and any extra legal expenses had been included; speakers said overall legal fees were accounted for in the budget. Staff also reported that a fraud risk assessment was included in the meeting packet and will be submitted to the state auditor after the presentation.
The staff member recommended approving utility rate changes for sewer, garbage and stormwater now so the new rates can be reflected on July invoices; the staff explanation noted these increases have been discussed in earlier budget meetings and that not passing them would require the city to cover the shortfall. Several council members requested that staff explicitly present the rate changes during the regular council meeting so the public is aware of the increases.
The agenda included a motion to approve the city fee schedule, which incorporates the utility rates. The transcript does not record a formal vote in this work meeting; the motion and the fee schedule appear as an action item on the agenda packet.
Next steps: staff will refine impact-fee amounts that could not be invoiced before June 30 and will present the final interim budget items and rate changes to the council for formal action at the appropriate meeting.
