Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parent reads from challenged novel and board member asks rubric review

Clay County District Schools Board of Education · June 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A parent read passages from a previously challenged book and urged the board to re-evaluate its placement under the district rubric; a board member asked staff to pull the text for review during board follow-up.

Bruce Friedman, a resident who identified himself during the presentations-from-the-audience period, told the Clay County School Board that the district must reassess a novel he has challenged for years, The Music of What Happens by Bill Konigsberg. Friedman said his appeal of the book’s placement was denied and urged the board to reapply the district’s community rubric.

"My appeal was denied," Friedman said, and he read passages and a third-party report he said documented explicit content and themes he found inappropriate for students. He urged the board to "revisit your rubric" and "make it right." The board did not take an immediate vote on the matter during the meeting.

Board member Miss Hanson followed public comment by asking staff to pull the book Friedman read and re-evaluate it against the updated community rubric. Hanson read aloud a letter from a local teacher praising Clay High and used that point to underline community investment in local schools while also asking for the district to ensure materials meet rubric standards.

The meeting record shows no formal motion or decision to remove the title during the session. The chair acknowledged the request and said the board would look again at the book in question. The board’s procedure for public comment and appeals was described at the start of the meeting; staff indicated appeals have been processed previously but did not provide a new timetable for reconsideration.

The board’s next steps, as stated in the meeting, are staff review of the requested text under the community rubric and potential follow-up at a future board meeting.