Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves nine existing tsunami‑zone short‑term rental permits and denies two new Samoa permits over neighborhood‑concentration concerns
Summary
After a consolidated staff presentation, the commission approved nine existing short‑term rental conditional use permits in the Humboldt Bay area (Manila, Fairhaven, King Salmon, Samoa) and denied two new permits for Samoa properties because they would exceed neighborhood‑concentration limits and risk displacing housing for residents.
The planning commission voted on a consolidated package of short‑term rental (STR) applications in the Humboldt Bay area after a staff presentation and public comment that cut across tsunami‑hazard and neighborhood‑concentration rules.
Assistant planner Kathleen Johnston told the commission staff had reviewed 11 applications across Manila, Fairhaven, King Salmon and Samoa and distinguished 'existing' operators (those who submitted proof of operation predating 10/26/2023) from 'new' operators. Staff recommended approval of nine existing STRs, with conditions requiring displayed tsunami evacuation plans and distribution of a good‑neighbor guide to neighbors within 300 feet; staff recommended denial of two new permits (agenda items 4 and 5) because they would cause the neighborhood‑concentration caps to be exceeded in Samoa.
Applicants and property managers representing several of the existing units said they manage the properties responsibly, pay transient occupancy taxes and maintain on‑site safety plans. Some owners and managers said their rentals generally host small groups (couples or small families), help keep properties maintained and have not generated neighbor complaints. Several prospective owners argued that short‑term rental revenue made it financially viable for them to maintain property and eventually relocate permanently to the town.
Opponents, including long‑term Samoa residents, said concentrated STR approvals would change neighborhood character, reduce the supply of housing for locals and strain unimproved infrastructure. Several residents raised procedural concerns about mailed notices in Samoa and asked the commission to pause approvals until notification gaps were fixed.
After hearing applicants and public comment, the commission adopted staff’s recommendation in part: it approved the nine existing STR conditional use permits and special‑permit exceptions as listed in the consolidated staff report but denied the two new Samoa permit applications (items 4 and 5) because they did not meet the neighborhood‑concentration findings required for approval. The roll call on the nine‑unit package recorded a 4‑to‑1 vote with one commissioner dissenting; the denials of the two new Samoa permits passed unanimously.
What’s next: Approved permits will proceed under the standard conditions (evacuation plans, good‑neighbor distribution, occupancy limits). Denied applicants may revise or apply under different circumstances, but staff warned that approving new units in Samoa would push multiple streets over the county’s 10% per‑access‑road concentration limit.
