Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beautification committee members oppose city proposal to cut advisory meetings from monthly to six a year
Summary
Committee members at the June 3 meeting expressed concern about a city memo proposing to reduce advisory‑committee meetings from 12 to six annually (plus optional workshops), saying fewer meetings would limit the committee’s ability to prepare items for council and maintain seasonal programs.
Members of the Marco Island Beautification Advisory Committee used most of their June 3 meeting to discuss a city manager memo proposing to reduce advisory‑committee meeting schedules from monthly to six meetings a year, plus up to two optional workshops.
One member said they opposed the change and had sent a letter to city council, recounting that several advisory‑committee chairs attended a recent council session and that the council postponed the item. "I am opposed to this," the member said, adding that monthly meetings are necessary during busy program months and to review items before they reach council.
Committee members raised specific operational concerns: with fewer scheduled meetings they said the group would need direction from council on which 30–40 percent of their roughly 17 recurring tasks should be dropped. Members also worried about losing momentum during peak activity months (January–March) when many public programs occur.
Chair Needles said she had spoken to multiple council members and would support a schedule of six regular meetings "with the option to add as many as we want" during active months. Members discussed individual and collective outreach to council — including writing to council members or sending a single committee letter — but agreed council will ultimately decide the change.
Several members said the proposal was driven by staff time and workload; staff representatives said public‑notice rules (roughly two weeks) and quorum requirements would shape how ad‑hoc meetings could be scheduled. The committee planned to have at least one representative attend the next council meeting where the agenda item is discussed and to continue coordinating a response.
The committee did not take a binding vote to oppose the memo at this meeting but agreed to continue discussion and to ask staff for clarification on notice and scheduling mechanics before the next meeting.
