Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lake Elmo council approves up to $30,000 to repair failed booster pump serving southern area

Lake Elmo City Council · June 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council authorized up to $30,000 to repair a failed booster pump at a southern water transfer station after staff reported the unit became inoperable and removed the damaged assembly; a like-for-like replacement is expected in 1–2 weeks while a stainless-steel rebuild was estimated at about $52,000 and 12 weeks lead time.

Lake Elmo officials voted May 19 to approve repairs to a failed booster pump at the city's southern water transfer station, authorizing up to $30,000 for an expedited, like‑for‑like replacement and related inspections.

Public works staff told the council one of two pumps at the booster station failed during the week of May 18 and was removed for inspection; internal components were severely damaged. Staff presented two options: a stainless‑steel rebuild estimated at about $52,000 with roughly a 12‑week lead time, or a bronze‑fitted rotating assembly that staff said could be sourced in one to two weeks for about $20,000. Council members and staff discussed inspection of the remaining pump and the tradeoffs between longevity and speed of repair.

City staff said the repair was not budgeted in the public works operating budget but identified roughly $58,000 available in contracted services within the water enterprise fund. The council approved the motion to make necessary repairs not to exceed $30,000. Staff indicated the city will inspect the secondary pump once the first is back in service and assess longer‑term replacement needs in coming years as system buildout proceeds.

The council framed the vote as an urgent maintenance decision to preserve service and mitigate irrigation and customer impacts while longer‑term replacements and capital planning continue.