Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Vacancies topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sedona PSPRS board outlines nominations schedule as two seats become vacant

Sedona PD Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Local Board · June 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Sedona PSPRS local board discussed two upcoming vacancies—one public member and one sworn police seat—directed staff to repost openings, requested nominations from sworn personnel by June 15, and tentatively scheduled an August 6 meeting to consider membership approvals.

The Sedona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System local board discussed an expedited nominations and election timeline to fill two upcoming vacancies.

Brenda Holmes told the board that one public member, Lynn, is moving out of the area and will be available through the end of the month; a public posting has been issued but no applications had been received as of the previous Monday. Holmes asked public relations to repost the opening to solicit applicants.

The board also addressed a sworn police vacancy arising from Sergeant Perron’s resignation; Officer Lucas’s four‑year term ends in August. Holmes said she had begun soliciting nominations from sworn PD personnel and asked that nominations for the remainder of the vacated four‑year seat and a new two‑year seat be returned by June 15 so that the election process can begin in early July. If timing allows, new members would be agendized for membership approval no later than the board’s tentative August 6 meeting.

Members discussed scheduling complications: one board member said they have a county committee conflict on the prescheduled 8 a.m. start for the August meeting and suggested the meeting could start at 8 a.m. if the only business is to seat new members. The board noted that mayoral appointments and municipal transition timing (some actions typically occur in January) could affect continuity and asked staff to clarify parameters for seat transitions.

The board agreed to proceed with nominations and to return with election logistics at a future meeting. No formal vote was required for the scheduling and posting decisions.