Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Surveillance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Privacy concerns raised as Bethlehem reviews renewal of Flock Safety contract

Bethlehem City Council · June 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident urged Bethlehem to reconsider its license‑plate‑reader contract with vendor Flock Safety, citing national reporting and privacy risks; Deputy Chief Mysore said the city’s contract is up for renewal in July and is budgeted at roughly $41,000 this year.

Civil‑liberties concerns about automated license‑plate readers surfaced in public comment at the May 11 Bethlehem council meeting.

"I and so many others are frustrated that rooms full of elected adults can look at the growing mountain of evidence that Flock is, at best, irresponsible," Alex Miller said, citing media reports alleging improper access to camera feeds and delayed removals of leased devices in other municipalities.

Miller urged the city to consider whether continued use of the vendor’s ALPR (automatic license-plate reader) services is appropriate for local policing after noting an invoice dated May 2024 and saying, "This project costs around $85,000 per year in grant funding." He also pointed council members to public resources tracking searches tied to police use of ALPR data.

Council members asked operational and legal questions. Deputy Chief Mysore, who responded at council direction, said the Flock contract is up for renewal this year — "around July, I believe" — and that the program was included in this year's budget at about $41,000. Mysore said the police department has been part of regional ALPR activities for years and that the renewal process and privacy provisions should be examined before making a renewal decision.

Vice President Laird and others requested copies of the vendor’s statement of work, hosting and privacy terms and any contract language that governs access and marketing use. No vote was taken; council members asked staff and legal counsel to circulate contract and privacy terms in advance of a renewal decision.