Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Use Permit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves special permit for oversized garage at 36 Woods Hill Road
Summary
The North Branford Planning & Zoning Commission approved a special-use permit allowing a homeowner to build a 46-by-36-foot detached garage at 36 Woods Hill Road following applicant presentations, staff confirmations of agency sign-offs, and a neighbor's questions about well proximity; the vote recorded 4–1 in favor.
The North Branford Planning & Zoning Commission voted to approve a special-use permit for a 46-by-36-foot detached garage at 36 Woods Hill Road on June 4, approving the homeowner’s application with standard and special conditions.
Applicant Tracy Planacek told the commission the finished structure would include electricity but no plumbing and would be used for vehicle and household storage. "We want to have my car inside for winter," Planacek said, describing plans to match the garage exterior to the existing house and to extend a tree line to screen neighbors.
Town planner David Perkins told the commission the application had received comments and approvals from the health department and the regional water authority, that required notices were posted, and that the proposal met applicable setback and bulk regulations. He said erosion- and runoff-control measures will be required as part of the later building-permit submission.
Neighbor Stefano Troponi, at 26 Woods Hill Road, asked whether the building’s location would endanger his well or change groundwater flow and whether state or local setback rules required further testing. Troponi said he had recently tested his well and worried that construction disturbance could affect water quality. Perkins replied that setback guidance commonly used by the health department begins at 25 feet and that the health department typically manages well and septic safety, not the land-use commission. "The setback... can be as close as 25 feet," Perkins said, adding that foundation work is not expected to disturb the aquifer at common depths and that the health department focuses on septic setbacks.
After staff and applicant replies and brief clarifications on erosion-control expectations, the commission closed the public hearing and took a vote. A motion to approve the special-use permit passed, recorded in the minutes as "Motion carries 4 to 1." The commission noted that the subsequent building-permit application must show silt fences and other erosion-control measures before construction begins.
The project will proceed to the building-permit stage, where town staff will review the detailed erosion-control and foundation plans; the commission made clear those site-level controls are conditions of approval.
