Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bend‑LaPine board directs district to revise student incident reports after family raises concerns

Bend-LaPine Administrative SD 1 Board of Directors · June 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Bend‑LaPine Board of Directors voted June 2 to direct district staff to amend findings and incident reports related to a student confrontation so the written record aligns with video evidence and a family’s Feb. 20 letter. The motion, moved by Director Jen Lynch and seconded by Director Cameron Fisher, passed by voice vote.

The Bend‑LaPine Administrative SD 1 Board of Directors voted June 2 to direct district staff to revise the findings and incident reports for a recent student incident so the written record reflects what was seen in video evidence and the concerns outlined by the family.

Board Chair called the special meeting following an executive session under ORS 192.660(2)(b) and (2)(f). Director Jen Lynch moved that “the district amend the investigative reports to be reflective of what was seen in the videos.” Director Cameron Fisher seconded the motion; the board approved it by voice vote and the chair declared "ayes have it." The board instructed staff to redact student data as required.

Why it matters: The family, represented in the meeting by Heidi Jarvis, told the board the district record inaccurately portrayed the student as the sole aggressor and that school administration and the school resource officer provided "a false narrative," according to a Feb. 20 letter from Eric Powell that the board cited in directing next steps. Jarvis told the board she wanted an "accurate reflection" of events in the written reports and said video footage captures much of the incident though it may not record all audio cues.

Board discussion focused on how to fix the record. Director Shirley Olsen proposed striking the initial district report from the student file and requiring a revised incident report that incorporates available documentation, a review of both videos and an interview with the student. Other board members suggested enumerating the family's specific concerns from the Feb. 20 letter — discrepancies between the incident description, the chronology and the video, questions about the SRO’s description of events, and concerns about alleged excessive force — and directing administration to address them in the revisions.

The board also discussed a review of campus supervision, including the SROs and campus monitors, as part of the response. The motion as finalized directed the district and staff to revise findings resulting from the incident in accordance with the parent concerns and requests outlined in the Feb. 20 letter, with necessary redactions for student privacy.

Quotations and attribution follow the meeting record. Parent Heidi Jarvis said, "I would like it to be accurate," when asked what remedy she wanted. Director Jen Lynch framed the board's action in procedural terms when she moved to delegate the district to amend records so they "are reflective of the video evidence." Director Shirley Olsen urged that "the initial district report [be] struck from the record of the student, and the revised incident report be written" with supporting documentation and an interview.

The board called a voice vote after a brief period of wordsmithing on the motion; no member voiced opposition. The chair declared the motion carried and adjourned the meeting. After adjournment, a director commended the family for seeking a corrected record and another said, "I don't think we can say, we're sorry enough for this."

Next steps: The board directed district staff to carry out the revisions and to enumerate the family's concerns in the written motion so they are clear, while redacting student-identifying information as required by law. The board did not specify a public timeline for the revisions during the meeting.