Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Superintendent Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pasadena ISD board approves amendment to superintendent’s contract in special session
Summary
At a special Sept. 19 meeting, the Pasadena ISD Board of Trustees reconvened from closed session and approved an amendment to the superintendent’s contract; the board noted compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act and adjourned shortly after the vote.
The Pasadena Independent School District Board of Trustees met in special session on Thursday, Sept. 19, 2024, in the district administration building boardroom and approved an amendment to the superintendent’s contract after reconvening from closed session.
Board members present — Mr. Kenny Fernandez, Miss Poola Gonzalez, Mr. Marshall Kendrick, Ms. Vicky Morgan, Miss Nela Sullivan and Casey Felin — were listed aloud at the start of the meeting; Miss Crystal Davala was noted absent. The board said meeting notice had been posted in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 551).
The board adjourned to closed session citing Texas Government Code sections 551.071 and 551.074. The meeting then reconvened in open session with an announced reconvening time of 6:02 p.m. During open session the agenda included consideration of “possible approval of the amendment to superintendent’s contract and related action.” A motion was placed on the floor and, following a mover and second recorded in the minutes, the board voted; the presiding official announced the motion carried.
No public comments were registered during the open-session public-comment period. The board recorded that there were no administrative personnel items beyond the contract item under consideration. The meeting was declared adjourned at 6:03 p.m.
The board did not state individual vote tallies or identify the motion mover in the oral record provided in the transcript; the transcript records the motion discussion and the chair’s announcement that the motion carried. Further details about the specific contract language, effective dates, or any implementation steps were not specified in the open-session transcript.
