Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pay Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dallas County delays pay-plan revisions as supervisors debate ECI timing and merit-eligibility window
Summary
The board reviewed proposed changes to the county pay plan — swapping comparator jurisdictions, using third-quarter ECI data for budgeting and renaming 'COLA' to a 'market adjustment' — but deferred final action after supervisors requested more analysis on indices and eligibility windows.
Get email alerts on the Pay Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beth, Dallas County human-resources staff, presented a revised pay plan that would replace Debuke and Jasper counties as external comparators with Woodbury, Black Hawk and Scott counties and add the cities of Urbandale and Clive to better reflect the labor market. She said the document also changes the terminology from a "cost-of-living increase" to a "market adjustment," and recommends using third-quarter Employment Cost Index (ECI) data for budgeting rather than fourth-quarter ECI data, which is not available until late January.
"If we used the third-quarter data ... I would have that number going into the budgeting session," Beth said, describing the timing benefits of an earlier ECI reference. She told the board the county has used the ECI since 2020–21 and that the index measures changes in wages and benefits for the government sector.
Supervisors questioned whether the ECI or the Consumer Price Index (CPI) better reflects employee cost pressures and asked for a comparison of recent years. One supervisor said the ECI measures wages and benefits rather than employee inflation; another asked staff to run a multi-year comparison to show differences between CPI and ECI outcomes.
Beth also proposed changing the new-hire merit-eligibility window from 90 days to 120 days (four months). One supervisor urged a 180-day (six-month) window, arguing longer exposure is needed to assess performance; another warned a longer exclusion could discourage engagement for new employees.
The board did not take action on the pay-plan changes at the meeting and asked staff to provide further information, including a comparative analysis of CPI versus ECI outcomes and additional detail on the proposed comparator jurisdictions. A follow-up discussion will occur once that analysis is available.

