Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners vote to remove an election judge pending investigation; officials call for clearer standards
Summary
The board moved to remove one election judge following social-media posts and complaints, and commissioners directed staff to gather evidence on additional allegations; county staff and legal advisors urged a documented policy and consistent procedures for appointed election workers.
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln County commissioners moved May 27 to remove an election judge from service pending an internal investigation after complaints about social-media posts and alleged partisan statements by appointed election workers.
County elections staff briefed the board on recent complaints alleging biased or threatening social-media activity by election judges. The county attorney recommended commissioners exercise authority to remove an election judge because commissioners ultimately appoint judges.
Commissioners voted to remove the named judge (motion made and seconded) and asked elections staff to provide documentation about two other judges whose conduct has been questioned. Elections administrator Melanie (as referenced in the meeting) said she would forward evidence the office had received.
Public commenters and a human-resources advisor cautioned the board to adopt consistent, evidence-based procedures before removing appointed workers permanently. Commenters urged the county to develop clear guidance and a handbook for election judges that explains expectations and consequences, and noted potential legal exposure if removals succeed without documented policy and progressive-discipline steps. Commissioners asked staff and legal counsel to gather the records and return with recommended procedures.
What happens next: The removed judge will be notified and the county will investigate other complaints. Commissioners asked staff for written evidence on other judges before taking further action and indicated they may seek clearer contract or handbook language for future elections.

