Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Long Term Care topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner warns Strafford County nursing-home bed cap and Medicaid shortfalls are straining Riverside
Summary
County officials said a state cap on Medicaid-licensed nursing-home beds and limited state funding for home- and community-based programs have left Riverside operating at about 170 occupied beds and pushed counties to pick up large CFI costs, pressuring local budgets and hospital discharges.
Get email alerts on the Long Term Care topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Strafford County officials on the committee hearing said the county’s nursing-home system is under pressure from a state-imposed cap on Medicaid-licensed nursing-home beds and inadequate funding for community alternatives.
A county commissioner told the committee the Riverside facility is operating at roughly 170 occupied beds, below its licensed capacity of 215, largely because of staffing limits and facility constraints. “When they cap the number of nursing home beds the reimbursement systems changed,” the commissioner said, adding that workforce shortages and dependence on travel nurses have raised operating costs.
The commissioner and committee members traced the situation to a policy decision that froze the number of Medicaid-licensed nursing-home beds statewide and was intended to redirect funding into home- and community-based care, commonly discussed in the meeting as Choices for Independence (CFI). Committee members said the planned expansion of CFI was never funded at the level envisioned. “We capped the number of nursing home beds with the idea we were going to expand home and community based services,” the commissioner said. “But they didn’t fund the other side.”
Committee members noted several practical effects: older facilities that remain licensed are sometimes operating below licensed capacity; newer, private facilities attract private-pay residents and draw admissions away from county homes; and some assisted-living properties that accept CFI remain vacant because reimbursement rates and market dynamics make admissions unlikely. The commissioner pointed to examples in neighboring counties and said some operators spend $11–12 million on travel nurses in a year to maintain census and staffing.
Members also discussed why licensed beds cannot simply be transferred between facilities. The commissioner explained that, under current rules, Medicaid-licensed bed capacity is not freely transferable between providers and that licensing for new Medicaid beds is constrained by statute. “You cannot get licensed by Medicare or Medicaid for any [new beds]; that’s in state statute,” the commissioner said.
Financially, committee members said counties have absorbed a substantial share of CFI costs because the legislature did not provide the expected state funding. The commissioner estimated counties collectively are carrying roughly $135 million in related costs. The committee also discussed how Medicaid reimbursement and the “budget neutrality” factors reduce payments to providers — particularly county-run homes with older buildings that lack capital depreciation allowances that newer private facilities receive.
The meeting included operational details the committee said matter for planning: MDS (minimum data set) resident assessments drive reimbursement levels; delays in state Medicaid processing and a reduction in retroactive billing periods (from six months to three months in the cited example) reduce facility cash flow; and a backlog of applications makes some admissions slower to convert to Medicaid revenue.
Committee members asked about local supply: the commissioner said two assisted-living buildings in the county are vacant (one identified in Farmington) and suggested the county could explore whether rehabilitating or leasing existing facilities, supporting private nonprofits, or using county land could expand assisted-living capacity that accepts CFI. Legal and federal rules limit direct county subsidies to Medicaid payments, however, and CMS waiver/grandfathering rules affect when assisted living and nursing care can co-locate.
The committee did not take formal policy votes beyond approving the previous meeting’s minutes; members agreed to continue information gathering, to schedule field visits to recently renovated facilities in Sullivan and Marramac counties for October/November, and to circulate additional documents before the next meeting.
Why it matters: Committee members said the combination of a capped nursing-home supply, chronic staffing shortages, and incomplete funding for community alternatives pushes more medically complex patients back into hospitals or delays discharges — increasing costs for hospitals and counties and limiting options for low-income residents who cannot compete with private-pay demand.
Next steps: The committee intends to collect more financial and occupancy data, follow up on the exact locations and status of the two vacant assisted-living buildings, and run field trips to compare renovation costs and staffing models in other counties.

