Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Shriber Meadows topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners pause Shriber Meadows preliminary plat after public concerns over water and wildlife
Summary
The commission continued review of the Shriber Meadows North and South preliminary plats to next week after public comment raised questions about water rights, wildlife buffers and development that has occurred before final approvals; staff and the developer said the 34–36 conditions and state approvals (DEQ/DNRC) must be met before final plat.
Get email alerts on the Shriber Meadows topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln County commissioners postponed action on the Shriber Meadows North and South preliminary plats on June 11 after an extended public comment period and detailed staff presentation of recommended conditions.
Planning staff presented the North plat with 36 recommended conditions addressing access and roads, required permits from MDOT and the U.S. Forest Service, DEQ/DEEQ approval for water and wastewater, FEMA elevation mapping requirements, wildfire fuels-reduction and maintenance obligations, no-build shading on slopes over 30 percent, and a 150-foot vegetated buffer plus a 50-foot building setback along Shriber Creek (200 feet total). The recommended conditions also require covenants that prohibit multifamily use and require long-term noxious-weed and fuels maintenance plans.
During public comment, Maggie Craig, who identified herself at the podium, criticized the adequacy of mitigation for wildlife and water rights and questioned why development and roadwork had occurred prior to preliminary approval. "All of that mitigation that's been identified benefits the people who will live there. There is no mitigation for wildlife," Craig said, and raised a technical question about whether 27 wells in subdivisions can rely on 10-acre-foot exempt use or whether combined appropriations trigger permitting requirements.
Developer representative Andy Evensson responded that the project is not proposing surface-water rights and that the project must meet state non-degradation and KOSA rules for groundwater; he said the project has 10 acre-feet available for the north and 10 for the south under prior record dates and that DEQ/DEEQ and DNRC approvals are required before final plat. Evensson also asked the board to consider relying on established IBC setbacks rather than an additional lot-specific geotechnical evaluation proposed for one steep lot.
Commissioners noted the technical and enforcement questions raised about buffers and water monitoring and agreed further discussion and possible edits to conditions are needed. They continued both Shriber Meadows North and South to a future meeting (next week) so staff and the planner can clarify language, enforcement mechanisms, and relevant agency requirements.
The board emphasized that preliminary plat approval does not guarantee final plat: developers must demonstrate compliance with the listed conditions and obtain required state approvals, and failure to do so will preclude final plat approval.
Actions: The commission continued consideration of both Shriber Meadows North and South to allow staff and the applicant to refine conditions regarding water use limits, buffer designations and geotechnical requirements before a subsequent vote.

