Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roads topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission begins study of bonding policy for overweight hauling, tables action
Summary
A commissioner proposed studying an overweight-hauling bonding policy to protect county roads from damage caused by oil/gas/trucking operations; commissioners discussed case-by-case bonding, exemptions for small loggers, and enforcement, then voted to table further action pending more information.
A commissioner introduced a proposal to develop a road-bond policy that would require bonds or a form of guarantee to protect county road assets from uninsured damages caused by overweight hauling connected with oil and gas activity, logging and heavy trucking.
Why it matters: Commissioners said increased traffic from oil-and-gas and sand/trucking operations has caused accelerated wear on county roads; a bonding policy could give the county a mechanism to recover repair costs when project operators damage pavement and infrastructure.
Key discussion points included whether to require bonds company-by-company or project-by-project, whether to exempt small independent loggers operating on thin margins, and alternatives such as requiring landowners or large timber companies to post bond instead of individual drivers. Commissioners also described common practical problems: contractors leaving after tearing up roads and disappearing before remediation occurs.
Outcome: The court voted to table the item and requested staff to return with more information on implementation options and legal/administrative language for a targeted, case-by-case policy.
Representative quote: "...if they're going to come put a rig up, going to use this road, you got to put this bond up so in case you tear this road, be good," a commissioner said describing the proposal's intent.
Ending note: The item was tabled for additional study and staff follow-up; no policy was adopted at this meeting.
