Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Criminal justice subcommittee approves boarding item; Strafford County delegates debate ICE detainee rights and paperwork
Summary
The criminal justice subcommittee unanimously approved an item after public comment. Commissioners described the jail's limited role with ICE (transport to medical appointments only), discussed roughly 90 convicted inmates awaiting deportation and about 40 detainees with 'unreliable paperwork,' and referenced federal court rulings and a recent detainee release.
The Strafford County criminal justice subcommittee met and unanimously approved a measure after public comment, and at the delegation meeting commissioners debated the county jail's role in handling immigration detainees and the legal rights those detainees may have.
A commissioner reported the subcommittee's approval and said about six to eight constituents attended the meeting. In the larger delegation discussion the same commissioner said the sheriff's department’s involvement with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is limited — "the only transportation the sheriff's department does to ICE is to doctor's appointments ... emergency hospital visits" — and that the department does not perform ICE apprehensions. He said the county currently houses roughly "90 people who have been convicted of crimes" awaiting deportation and an additional "40" detainees whose paperwork the speaker described as "unreliable."
The speaker referenced federal court decisions that he said showed detainees receive hearings, and said he would forward copies of rulings from four federal judges to Representative Miller to illustrate his point. The commissioner also invoked an earlier Supreme Court ruling while noting that "the courts have interjected themselves" since then; the transcript records that claim as the speaker's characterization rather than a legal finding.
The delegation also recounted a recent release: after a federal public defender and a deputy U.S. attorney raised concerns about the timing of a release, a judge issued an order praising Superintendent Brackett’s management and urging timely action; a county official named Chris coordinated the release, and the speaker said it occurred within roughly 30 minutes of the court order.
The discussion included skepticism about a local news report that the county had received a $10 million payment in connection with hosting detainees; the commissioner said the county "never" received such a payment and speculated the article may have cited an allocation or maximum contract amount rather than an actual payment.
No formal change in county policy or ordinance was recorded during the delegation session. The transcript records debate, document-sharing promises and the subcommittee's unanimous approval of the earlier item; commissioners asked staff to continue sharing court documents and to keep legislators informed.
