Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Corrections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Strafford County delegation hears jail briefing on ICE, U.S. Marshals boarding, capacity and processing plans
Summary
Officials told the Strafford County revenue subcommittee they are negotiating higher boarding and transport rates with ICE and the U.S. Marshals, exploring a local processing center to reduce transports, and managing fluctuating detainee counts within a nominal 495‑bed capacity. The subcommittee discussed inspections, medication-assisted treatment reimbursements and opioid-related grants.
County officials briefed the Strafford County revenue subcommittee on jail operations, inmate boarding revenue and capacity, saying boarding contracts and transport fees have become a notable revenue line and that the county is pursuing rate increases and operational adjustments.
“We’re in the process now of negotiating with ICE and with the U.S. Marshals for increases in rates,” Al Holland said, describing efforts to raise both boarding and transport payments. Holland said the county has already adjusted boarding rates and is negotiating transport rates; he added that ICE boarding can be more lucrative because of allowable profit and other inclusions in ICE contracts.
Staff identified the U.S. Marshals transport line at about $130,000 per year and said transport-related expenses would rise along with any increase in transports; converting a space in the jail into a local processing center could reduce the need to transport arrestees to Burlington or Manchester, officials said. That conversion, staff said, could allow processing to happen locally and potentially increase the number of inmates housed while leaving transport counts the same or lower.
Officials told the subcommittee ICE inspects the county facility frequently (about eight times a year) and that the county strives to meet ICE’s medical and other standards. Holland commented that the county’s experience with ICE oversight differs from media portrayals and emphasized inspection frequency and medical oversight.
On capacity, staff gave ranges and examples: current ICE detainee counts were described as roughly 130, with the facility able to handle between about 110 and 150 ICE detainees depending on classification and bed availability; total nominal jail capacity was stated as 495 but actual usable capacity varies with custody classification, gender balance and gang-affiliation separation.
The briefing also touched on medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and opioid funding: the county previously received reimbursement for MAT back costs and officials said they expect ongoing, staged payments from opioid settlements but that future grant opportunities are uncertain. Delegation members asked clarifying questions; staff said they will update the criminal-justice subcommittee and the delegation as negotiations and grant developments proceed.
The subcommittee did not take a separate vote on operational jail items at this meeting; the presentation was part of the packet reviewed before the vote to accept revenue and capital estimates.
