Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reentry Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Delegation hears about transitional housing, drug court and corrections budget changes
Summary
Community Corrections presenters told the subcommittee they supervise about 600 people across drug court, mental-health court and transitional housing; transitional housing budget rose slightly, drug court spending fell due to staffing changes, and the transitional program emphasized reentry supports and resident contributions toward rent.
Presenters for Community Corrections described a suite of reentry services that include transitional housing, drug court, mental-health court and supervision for fewer than 600 people in the community.
The director said the county's transitional housing units sit on the house-of-corrections campus and can house people released from custody who have completed programming. Historically the presenter said the program serves about 15 men and five women; average lengths of stay cited in the exchange were roughly 35 days for men and 39 days for women. Residents are expected to contribute toward rent (presenter cited a common contribution of 30% after 30 days) and receive weekly case-management plans and connections to self-help meetings and work programs.
The presenter said transitional housing spending rose slightly this year because of modest salary increases, while drug court spending decreased largely because a director took a state position and there were internal staffing adjustments; the director emphasized those are structural and program operations continue.
The presenter traced the program's origins to a Second Chance Act federal grant and said it later proved fiscally and morally sustainable; the presenter also said the county does not operate juvenile programs alongside adult services, citing state rules that require separation.
Committee members asked practical questions about site ownership and partnerships; the presenter said some recovery houses were municipal/county-owned and partnerships with Community Partners and other groups exist for housing operations. The subcommittee requested additional clarifications but did not change those program budgets at this meeting.
