Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sda Support Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District outlines community‑support plan after SDA swastika incident; parents press for broader protections
Summary
District staff and community partners described training, listening circles and a new Respond protocol after a human swastika incident at San Diego Academy; parents urged that supports be extended to all marginalized students and demanded clearer, accountable reporting and outreach to victims’ families.
The San Dieguito Union High School District presented an information update Oct. 16 on a community‑supportive plan developed after a human swastika incident at San Diego Academy (SDA) and described ongoing work with outside partners to strengthen reporting, training and student supports.
Dr. Sarah Brown of the American Jewish Committee summarized multiple in‑school trainings she recently led on the history and contemporary uses of the swastika and offered a three‑part model for educating staff and students. “Education is the best form of advocacy,” Brown told trustees, emphasizing sustained partnership rather than a single workshop.
District staff said they are holding staff listening circles, student forums and parent engagement nights in partnership with the National Conflict Resolution Center; they also announced a district‑wide parent engagement night set for Oct. 28 at Earl Warren Middle School. The district described a revised Respond protocol that clarifies reporting pathways, timelines and supports for affected students and that aims to centralize tracking of incidents.
Multiple parents and community representatives used public comment to say the district’s response has been incomplete and inconsistent. Monette Marino described two incidents on SDA campus in early 2025 in which her daughter was called the n‑word and said staff did not promptly report or investigate the matter. Another parent, who identified herself as the mother of a student victim, said the family was not contacted directly and called for a public apology and direct outreach.
Other commenters called for the district to ensure its anti‑bias and anti‑hate work covers all groups affected by hate, including Arab, Muslim, Latinx and LGBTQ+ students, and to make sure reporting pathways are visible, centralized and uniformly applied. One speaker asked why the community‑supportive plan is presented primarily as an anti‑Semitism plan and urged it be expanded into an inclusive, district‑wide framework.
What’s next: The district said it will continue implementation of the Respond protocol, work with partners to provide training and report back to the board; the district invited families to the parent engagement night on Oct. 28 and said it would continue quarterly updates to the board.
The presentation was informational; no policy vote was taken.
