Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Levy County advances concept for new Emergency Operations Center and 911 renovation

Levy County Board of County Commissioners · June 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Designers told commissioners the proposed Emergency Operations Center project is near budget and will meet ICC‑500 hardened‑structure standards; 911 renovation must follow EOC construction and requires more coordination with the sheriff on technical needs and final scope.

Levy County commissioners received a detailed design update on a proposed new Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and associated renovation of the county's 911 operations on Tuesday.

"We're on schedule...this plan for the EOC is done and ready to bid December 16," said the project's designer, describing a preliminary site plan on approximately 16.5 acres and a layout intended to meet longevity and low‑maintenance goals. The design includes an operations area (EOR), training spaces, bunk rooms, a logistics storage building and accessible parking; mechanical systems are being sized to ICC‑500 standards for 160‑mile‑per‑hour wind load requirements.

Why it matters: county emergency operations and 911 services are critical infrastructure. The consultant told the commissioners the 911 renovation is staged to follow the EOC build because both facilities are essential and cannot be shut down simultaneously; that sequencing affects the construction schedule and budget. "You can't go into the 911 renovation until EOC is built...they're both essential facilities," the designer said.

Technical and schedule points: the design calls for hardened mechanical yards, generator capacity, and redundancy for communications. The designer said the 911 space requires more detailed equipment review with the sheriff's office; the current plan adds roughly 2,500 square feet to the existing 911 footprint. Construction‑document completion and advertisement for a construction manager at risk were reported to be imminent, with expectations to bid trade packages later in the year.

Board response and next steps: commissioners asked whether the existing 911 operation could be used as a fallback; the designer explained there are contingency radio and communications workarounds but maintaining two fully operational 911 centers long term is not cost effective. The board signaled support for concept approval and asked staff to continue refining the 911 equipment list with the sheriff so final plans align with operational needs. Staff indicated a future agenda item will bring concept approval for formal action if the board wants to proceed to procurement.