Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vienna Board approves arbors, bridge, shed and sign at Salisbury Spring Park, conditions set on materials and ADA signage
Summary
The Vienna Board of Architectural Review on May 21 approved installation of two arbors, a small bridge, a 10x12 storage shed, engineered‑wood mulch paths and a new sign at Salisbury Spring Park (docket PFD-2151939-BAR), conditioned on submission of material spec sheets to town staff and removal of any signage claiming ADA accessibility.
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Vienna Board of Architectural Review voted May 21 to approve a package of small‑scale improvements at Salisbury Spring Park, including two cedar arbors, a short viewing bridge, a 10‑by‑12‑foot storage shed, engineered‑wood mulch on short paths and a new sign identifying the pocket park.
Leslie Herman, the town’s director of parks and recreation, told the board the project — developed with the local garden club — is intended “to create more of a draw” and would add features such as a sitting bridge and signage that makes it clear the site is a town park rather than a subdivision marker. Herman said the bridge will be set back from Lawyers Road and the bench will be relocated closer to the path, roughly 75 feet into the site; the storage shed would sit in a back corner and the mulch topping would be about 2 inches.
Why it matters: the plan aims to make a historically underused, pocket‑size spring more inviting while keeping the changes modest. Board members pressed for documentation that the chosen materials and construction meet standards and asked for details so staff can record how the path and mulch will be installed and maintained.
Board discussion centered on accessibility and materials. One member who identified themself as a landscape architect noted that while engineered wood mulch can meet code thresholds, it may not provide “universal accessibility” in practice, saying, “I don't really believe that it's truly ADA accessible” and urging the board to consider alternate surfacing if the goal is functional access for people who use wheelchairs. Garden club representatives and town staff said they had consulted an ADA specialist about compliance and would provide a documented installation method, describing the mulch as an engineered playground product and noting the short path length and sightlines near the bench.
The board attached two conditions when it approved the package by voice vote: the applicant must provide spec sheets for the arbor, bridge and shed to town staff, and no signage for the park may claim or advertise ADA accessibility (the board agreed a small directional note pointing to an accessible entrance could be handled separately). The board separately approved the new three‑plank sign, and members discussed allowing a small (up to 1.5 square feet) plaque to credit the Air Hill Garden Club without returning to the BAR.
“It's a lovely little space,” a nearby resident and garden‑club member said during public comment, urging the board to approve the improvements to encourage neighborhood use and native plantings. Board members acknowledged the neighborhood support and agreed to document the material specifications and installation details before final permitting.
Next steps: the applicant will deliver spec sheets for the arbor, bridge and shed to town staff for the record; the sign may be installed as approved, and the garden club may add a small plaque that meets the dimensional threshold that avoids additional review. The motions passed by unanimous voice vote.
