Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pavement Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves $364,423 pavement-management contract after 4–3 vote

Melbourne City Council · May 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Melbourne City Council approved a $364,423.26 professional services contract with Michael Baker International for a citywide pavement management study and an associated budget adjustment, 4–3, after questions about cost and impacts to paving work.

The Melbourne City Council voted 4–3 on May 26 to award a $364,423.26 professional services contract to Michael Baker International (Jacksonville) for a pavement-management program (project 68124) and approved an administrative budget adjustment to cover the difference.

Engineering staff told the council the contract will use updated imaging and data-collection technology to inventory pavement conditions, assess subsurface needs and produce a prioritized list of roadways to guide resurfacing choices. The study will replace the city’s decade-old data and help staff estimate longer-term funding needs.

Several council members pressed staff on the immediate fiscal trade-offs. One council member calculated that the amount equated roughly to half a mile of paving in the current budget and asked whether borrowing the money would reduce planned resurfacing. Engineering staff said the work is intended to improve prioritization and budgeting and suggested the study could prevent unnecessary resurfacing of streets that can be deferred.

City Manager Miss Lam and engineering staff said the last comprehensive study was issued in 2015, that industry guidance recommends studies every five to seven years, and that the current effort will capture updated traffic, flooding and material-condition data. Staff acknowledged market and inflation impacts on consultant pricing and said the $364,423.26 figure exceeded early budget estimates by about $100,000.

Council member Hanley moved approval of the contract and the budget adjustment; the motion carried on a roll-call vote, 4–3. The council asked staff to follow up with more detailed comparisons of estimated road miles affected and to consider whether other revenues or bond capacity could offset paving impacts.

Next steps: staff will finalize the contract and begin data collection; the resulting pavement-prioritization plan will be used to inform the next budget cycle and capital planning.