Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Miguel County adopts prioritized housing‑review code to access state funding, trims proposed tenant requalification language
Summary
After extensive debate over deed restrictions and AMI thresholds, the county adopted an amendment establishing a prioritized (formerly “accelerated”) housing review to meet Colorado’s Prop 1‑23 requirements, while removing planning‑commission language that would have tied qualification to each subsequent tenant or owner.
San Miguel County commissioners voted June 3 to adopt a new prioritized housing‑review process intended to qualify the county for Colorado Affordable Housing Fund incentives tied to Proposition 1‑23.
Staff said the draft amendment creates section 3‑15 in the land‑use code. Projects that opt in must devote at least 50% of units to qualifying affordability: rental units at or below 120% AMI and ownership units at or below 200% AMI, with housing costs capped at no more than 30% of household gross income. The process guarantees a final decision within 90 days after an application is determined complete, subject to allowable extensions and agency review pauses.
County planners and the public pressed for changes. A recurring concern from commissioners was whether the code should require a deed restriction for ongoing qualification — particularly language tying affordability to each subsequent tenant or owner. Planning commission members had recommended adding that phrase to preserve affordability across ownership and tenancy changes, but several commissioners said drafting permanent deed restrictions in a process primarily meant to speed review risked over‑regulation and could lock projects into terms that later constrain viability.
The board adopted the amendment with two explicit conditions: (1) strike the planning‑commission addition that tied AMI ranges to “the qualification of each subsequent tenant or owner,” and (2) change the amendment’s title and internal references from “accelerated housing review” to “prioritized housing review” to reduce misperceptions that public processes would be skipped. The motion passed by a recorded voice vote.
Staff said all existing land‑use standards, public‑notice requirements and referral steps remain in force; the amendment only changes timing priorities and provides an opt‑in fast‑track for qualifying affordable projects. Commissioners directed staff to finalize the updated resolution language and to bring any deed‑restriction templates or clarifications back for future discussion.
Next steps: County staff will publish final code language reflecting the board’s two conditions and continue coordination with the Strategic Stakeholder Roundtable and planning commission to align deed‑restriction practice with the county’s broader housing policy.
