Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves Elite Infrastructure Group bid for Taylor Street drainage despite higher-than-estimate cost

Lancaster City Council · June 26, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council voted unanimously to accept a low bid of $912,050 from Elite Infrastructure Group for the Taylor Street drainage project; the cost exceeds the original $752,700 estimate, raising the city's share to $212,050 (23%) with $159,350 covered by interest earnings, contingent on state approval.

Lancaster's City Council voted to accept a $912,050 low bid from Elite Infrastructure Group to construct the Taylor Street drainage project, a cost above the city's original $752,700 construction estimate.

City staff reported two bids: Elite Infrastructure Group at $912,050 and North American Pipeline Management at $1,026,350. The city’s contribution was described as increasing from $52,700 (7% of the original estimate) to $212,050 (23% of the higher bid). Staff said the $159,350 additional requirement would come from interest earned in a designated account and that the project engineer recommended awarding the contract contingent on state approval.

"Elite has a low bidder with a total bid price of $912,050," staff reported, and noted the engineer certified the bid sheet. Staff estimated permitting and state review could take three to four weeks; with prompt submittal, construction could start in September or early October and finish in April–May 2025.

Council held a motion and approved the recommendation by roll call; recorded responses in the transcript show unanimous yes votes from council members and the mayor. The approval is contingent on state approval before issuing a notice to proceed.

The record shows the higher cost stems from market conditions and project complexities; staff said the Ferguson Street segment should be simpler than earlier projects that required utility reroutes and other complications.