Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Grading Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board adopts revised grading policy after extended discussion; AR to be refined

Talbot County Board of Education (Talbot County Public Schools) · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Talbot County Board of Education approved a revised grading policy (Policy 9.25) on May 20, 2026, directing staff to return a cleaned administrative regulation and guidance for teachers before implementation.

The Talbot County Board of Education on May 20 approved revisions to Policy 9.25, which change how student grades are calculated and emphasize formative reassessment. Dr. Einhorn presented the second‑reader package and said the committee had simplified assignment point values to align with a traditional four‑point system and clarified that failing or missing assignments will carry a 0 point value in the proposed scale.

Supporters at the meeting, including two long‑time teachers who gave public comment, said the changes emphasize instruction and mastery. Jessica Castell, a 19‑year TCPS teacher who served on the grading committee, praised the committee’s work as “thoughtful” and said the policy “increases rigor and accountability while supporting learning and growth.” Lauren Greer, a nationally board‑certified CTE and science teacher, told the board that focusing reteaching on formative assessments better prepares students for high‑stakes credentialing exams.

Board members and commenters raised implementation concerns about the companion administrative regulation (AR): several speakers asked for clearer definitions (for example, the district’s references to a “quality point scale” and acronyms such as “WF”), examples of grade‑change scenarios, and guidance for course‑level practices (minimum numbers of formatives, due‑date expectations, and how teachers will convert numerical scores for PowerSchool). Dr. Einhorn said the committee ran district‑wide simulations and that a guidance document for teachers will be created over the summer to address those issues.

During discussion, one board member suggested a limited grace or transition period for cases where formative and summative results diverge significantly; the administration said it would monitor early outcomes and consider targeted guardrails. After debate, a motion to adopt Policy 9.25 passed; the board directed staff to return a cleaned and clarified AR and the guidance materials before the policy’s start of implementation.

The board will receive the revised AR in a subsequent meeting and the administration plans to provide implementation guidance to teachers and families ahead of the new school year.