Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Winslow Comp Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission sets May 14 public hearing on comprehensive plan and Winslow subarea code updates after Commerce guidance debate
Summary
After extended discussion about Department of Commerce guidance, base FAR assumptions and land-capacity analysis, the Planning Commission scheduled a May 14 public hearing on the periodic comprehensive plan update and Winslow subarea plan, and asked staff to re-run capacity analyses with clarified assumptions.
The Bainbridge Island Planning Commission voted unanimously to schedule a public hearing on May 14 to consider two ordinances: the periodic comprehensive-plan update (including the Winslow subarea plan) and municipal-code amendments implementing the plan changes.
Why it matters: The hearing will consider changes to development standards (including bonus and base FAR in specific zones), voluntary and mandatory housing programs, and the Winslow land-capacity analysis that the Department of Commerce reviewed and commented on. Commerce's letter requested 12 changes and asked the city to include land-capacity documentation and clarify assumptions used to reach housing-capacity conclusions.
Commerce guidance and land-capacity analysis: Staff told commissioners the Department of Commerce's land-capacity analysis they reviewed was based on a base FAR of 1.0 in Ferry and High School zones; staff noted Commerce's comments sometimes referenced municipal code posted online rather than the city's draft changes. Staff said Commerce also expects the city to include capacity documentation in the housing element and appendices.
Commission concern and next steps: Commissioners raised several technical questions—whether pipeline projects, city-owned parcels, or programmatic subsidies could be defensibly counted toward capacity; whether the city's voluntary inclusionary programs produce a defensible participation rate; and how changes to lot-coverage or commercial assumptions affect totals. Staff said they could re-run the land-capacity analysis using alternate base FAR assumptions (0.3 and 0.5 were discussed) once the commission confirms the assumptions to use and noted the June 30 adoption target. One staff member said the updated analysis could be available in roughly ten days if assumptions are provided.
Scheduling and notice: The commission voted to set a May 14 public hearing; staff described the noticing plan (official printed legal notice Monday, web posting of public-hearing drafts, inclusion in the May 1 'City Connects' newsletter, listservs and social media). Written comments will close at 4 p.m. on the hearing day per notice guidance.
Quote on capacity documentation: Planning staff summarized Commerce's request: "They asked us to provide capacity summary into the housing element and to include land capacity documentation as appendices to the final comprehensive plan," and offered to return with analysis runs once the commission confirms assumptions.
What remains unresolved: Commissioners still seek clearer guidance from Commerce about when programmatic assumptions (for example, higher participation if local subsidies are provided) can be included in capacity counts and whether city-owned conceptual plans can be counted. Staff said Commerce may answer questions directly at the public hearing if they participate. If the city confirms assumptions, staff will re-run the land-capacity analysis and publish results ahead of the hearing where feasible.
The commission set the public hearing and directed staff to proceed with reanalysis as soon as the commission provides assumptions to test.
