Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning committee backs back-in angled layout for Week's Garage, urges county to waive 8-foot landscaping
Summary
After reviewing a third revision to the Week's Garage permit, the advisory planning committee recommended 'variation 4' (back-in/angled parking) and asked staff to press public works to treat the spaces as historically used rather than "new" parking that would trigger an 8-foot planted strip requirement.
The advisory planning committee reviewed the Week's Garage permit revision and recommended a back-in, angled layout ("variation 4") while asking county public works to reconsider a comment that any new parking must include an 8-foot planted strip.
The committee chair, Barbara, read the public works comment into the record: "we just received a comment today ... from public works" noting the code provision that "any new parking needs to have an 8 foot planted strip between the parking and the public roads." Sofia, a county staff member who manages agendas and permit files, told the committee she thought the proposed layout was using an existing paved area and "wouldn't necessarily be new parking," and recommended staff-level review of whether the project requires a variance.
Business owners and users of the building told the committee the new layout is a safety improvement but raised operational concerns about blocking storage bays and loading access. One participant said the revised layout "could be a dream killer" for their planned outdoor seating and storage use, underscoring the trade-offs between pedestrian/safety improvements and private business operations.
Committee members sketched compromise designs during the discussion, including a hybrid of back-in angled stalls away from the building and retaining shared parking agreements with the adjacent library and businesses. Committee member Randy argued the committee should recommend a variance because the area has "always been parking there" and the current proposal redeploys an existing footprint rather than expanding into new paved area.
The committee agreed to draft a formal recommendation endorsing variation 4 (back-in/angled parking only) and to ask staff to follow up with public works on whether the 8-foot planting strip requirement applies, given the historical use of the pavement. Chair Barbara said she would draft the recommendation letter and circulate it to the committee before sending it to the Department of Community Development and public works.
The committee did not record a formal roll-call vote on the parking variance recommendation; members recorded consensus to proceed with the letter and the variation as the committee position.
