Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Workforce topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Delray Beach commissioners reject developer27s $320,000 buyout in lieu of two workforce units

Delray Beach City Commission · June 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission denied a developer27s request to pay $160,000 per unit ($320,000 total) instead of building two workforce housing units for a nine-unit West Atlantic mixed-use project, citing policy goals and doubts that the payment would equal the value and community benefit of on-site or off-site affordable units.

The Delray Beach City Commission on June 2 voted to deny a developer27s request to pay $320,000 in lieu of constructing two workforce housing units tied to a nine-unit project on West Atlantic Avenue.

The request, presented by attorney Jeffrey Lynn and developer Frank Belgiani, sought city approval to accept $160,000 per unit in place of constructing one low-income and one moderate-income workforce unit that were conditions of a prior 2023 site plan approval. Lynn said the change was driven by construction costs — roughly $900,000 to $1 million per unit in current estimates — and that the payment would allow the project to move forward to permitting.

The city27s planner reviewed the development incentives and explained alternatives available to the developer: record the workforce housing covenant and build the two on-site units, provide off-site units under an approved plan, submit a site-plan amendment to reduce unit count, or pay into the housing trust fund. Staff said the buyout would place $320,000 into the city27s housing trust for programs such as down-payment assistance or other housing initiatives.

Commissioners pressed the developer on whether $320,000 represented commensurate value for two workforce units and on enforceability and long-term affordability. "The exception was given to provide two units," Commissioner Cassell said, arguing that the payment would not deliver equivalent housing and that the city should pursue on-site or meaningful off-site solutions. Vice Mayor Burns and Commissioner Malikica echoed that view and favored options that yield actual affordable units rather than a relatively small buyout.

With those concerns and a direction from staff that off-site construction or a restrictive covenant were available options, the commission voted to deny resolution 81-26. The denial requires the developer to return with a revised approach — either to provide the required units on-site, propose a credible off-site replacement, reduce density, or otherwise amend the project.

Mayor Thomas F. Carney Jr. called for the developer to explore alternatives and encouraged follow-up with staff. Planning staff said the covenant is typically recorded at permitting and described the city's tools for ensuring affordability compliance should on-site units be provided.

The commission27s denial preserves the performance standard tied to the 2023 approval and underscores the city27s insistence that density incentives produce durable, on-the-ground workforce housing or an off-site solution of comparable community benefit.

The developer was thanked for coming before the commission and told staff and commissioners they would return with revised options.