Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Water Septic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission flags septic noncompliance and water-capacity implications as Laramie Farms development proceeds
Summary
Commission members reviewed a town health report that found roughly 38% of lakeside septic systems non-compliant, heard that the town is currently using about one-third of well capacity and that Laramie Farms could require about 65% of capacity (~320,000 gallons/day). Members discussed tightening septic enforcement and monitoring development impacts.
The Enfield Conservation Commission discussed town health and water-capacity reports that raised questions about septic compliance around the lakes and the impact of proposed development on municipal water resources.
Commission members summarized a report from Vinnie, the town health director, noting that "38% of the septics around the lake are non-compliant still," a figure participants said is unacceptably high and that the commission urged the health director to address. The report also highlighted island properties with graywater concerns that may require stricter oversight.
On water-supply capacity, the commission reviewed a town water report showing the system is currently using about one-third of its wells' capacity. Members noted that state guidance for capacity calculations excludes the highest-producing well when assessing redundancy; using that approach, the developer of the Laramie Farms project would likely consume an estimated 65% of capacity, which the commission paraphrased as "about 320,000 gallons per day". Commission members asked whether the developer will provide its own well or treatment for high-mineral water and noted both options are under consideration.
Members emphasized the need to track septic compliance and water infrastructure as development pressures increase. One member said the town previously purchased capacity in the Lebanon system as part of an agreement with Lebanon, which provides some cushion for new connections, but commission members cautioned that development pressures will require continued attention to regulation and monitoring.
Why it matters: High septic non-compliance near water bodies raises public-health and environmental risks; large new developments change the town's water-demand profile and may require mitigation measures or additional infrastructure oversight. The commission asked staff and the health director to follow up and to maintain the commission informed of any changes to approval conditions for proposed developments.
Next steps: Commission will monitor follow-up from the health director and request details from developers about well or treatment options and capacity commitments.
