Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Executive Session Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board enters executive session to review legal counsel correspondence on Seymour JCI contract
Summary
Citing statutory authority, the board moved into executive session to discuss privileged correspondence from the town attorney concerning the Seymour JCI performance contract; no substantive public decision was recorded on contract details.
The Board of Select Persons voted to enter executive session to discuss privileged correspondence from the town attorney regarding the Seymour JCI performance contract.
A motion described the session as permitted under the recited statutory authority and listed those to attend: members of the board, the town attorney (and correspondence from attorney Brianlair of the town attorney’s office was referenced), and Mr. Miller. The motion referenced attorney-client privilege. The motion carried on the floor and the board went into executive session. The board later reconvened in public and voted to come out of executive session; no substantive contract action was recorded in the public minutes during the meeting.
Because the discussion occurred in executive session and was described as privileged legal counsel, the board did not disclose the substance of the legal review in public session at the meeting.
