Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Teacher Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teachers press for time to document violent or disruptive incidents; board to review revised policy language
Summary
Teachers described repeated violent and disruptive incidents and urged negotiated-agreement language guaranteeing ‘reasonable time’ to regain composure and complete required documentation before a student returns; administrators agreed to edit policy language and take a revised provision to the board but declined to put full language into the negotiated agreement now.
Get email alerts on the Teacher Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teachers recounted incidents — hitting, biting, destruction of property and repeat physical behaviors — and urged negotiators to include a provision in the negotiated agreement guaranteeing a reasonable opportunity for certified staff to regain composure and complete incident documentation after level‑4/5 behaviors. Several teachers described feeling unsupported or afraid of retribution for reporting incidents.
Teachers and special‑education staff described concrete harms: wounds, repeated evacuations, and regular interruptions that left teachers feeling alone to manage crises. One teacher said the classroom often ‘‘gets back in order’’ only after the teacher had time to deescalate and document; another recounted wearing gardening gloves and a mask to reduce injury risk. Negotiators emphasized they sought precise language so teachers have time to compose required paperwork and the room can be stabilized before a student returns.
Administrators and board representatives acknowledged the district already has multiple policies addressing safety and reporting, but they expressed concern about placing conflicting or rigid procedural rules into the negotiated agreement. They proposed a compromise: revise board policy to change wording (for example, using 'may' or 'will' as appropriate) and add an explicit line promising teachers a 'reasonable opportunity' to regain composure and start necessary documentation; administrators will bring the edited policy language to the board for action. Negotiators said Slack (the consultative committee) should continue to meet and act as the mechanism for policy implementation and cross‑building support.
No final negotiated‑agreement provision was adopted in the session. The group agreed to add new policy language and to continue meeting to refine definitions of level‑4/5 behaviors, timelines for documentation and mechanisms for Slack‑committee consultation.

