Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nuisance Odors topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Pine County to act after months-long cannabis odor, cite township zoning confusion
Summary
Several Royaltton/Realton Township residents told the Pine County Board that a persistent cannabis odor has affected homes and health and that township zoning and county cannabis rules conflict; residents called for clearer permitting and enforcement.
Several residents used the public forum to press the Pine County Board of Commissioners to address a persistent cannabis odor and to clarify whether township zoning or county cannabis rules govern local permitting.
"I want to submit a complaint for the odor that we've been dealing with for the last month in May," said Denise Weiss, who identified herself as a Royaltton Township resident, saying the smell occurred "51.61% of the time" at her home, had penetrated her air conditioner and aggravated her asthma. "We can't have our windows open because there's weed smell floating around." Weiss said the odor forced guests to leave and asked staff to investigate; she handed copies of her complaint to county staff.
Patrice the Gray, who also identified herself as from Royaltton Township, read a written complaint (dated Nov. 17) saying township processes (environmental impact study, business plan review, neighbor interviews and interim or conditional use permitting) were bypassed when a cannabis business obtained county approval. "Somewhere along the line, all zoning has been deleted in the process," she said, and urged that townships be allowed to carry out their usual permit reviews or that county zoning be followed only after township review.
John Deg Grrey of Realton Township told the board he had received a written response from staff but remained confused because, he said, township zoning is more restrictive and should not be overridden without an interim-use process. He said a business seeking to expand had already failed to comply with township rules, and questioned why building permits were being considered before zoning compliance was settled.
County staff did not announce a formal enforcement action in response to the comments. Commissioners acknowledged the complaints and asked staff to accept the written materials residents handed them and to follow up. The public-comment speakers asked that the county clarify whether township zoning or county cannabis rules control land-use approvals and ensure that required environmental and neighborhood review steps are not omitted.
What happens next: The board accepted the written complaints and referred materials to county staff for follow-up and possible zoning review; no formal enforcement outcome was recorded in the meeting transcript.
