Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Solid Waste topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lincoln County opens single sealed bid for solid-waste hauling; first-year price exceeds current budget

Lincoln County Board of Commissioners · February 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Feb. 25 meeting commissioners opened a sealed bid from Evergreen Disposal proposing $465,000 for year one of the county solid-waste hauling contract, above the current budgeted $413,000. Commissioners deferred action to review contract details and residents urged clearer communication and negotiation on multi-year price increases.

Lincoln County commissioners opened a sealed bid for the county’s 2026 solid-waste hauling contract during their Feb. 25 meeting, and attendees raised immediate concerns about the price and contract terms.

The only bid presented—identified in the packet as from Evergreen Disposal—listed a proposed first-year cost of $465,000, up from the county’s current budgeted amount of $413,000. The proposal included 5% annual increases in years two through five, producing a projected year-five total of roughly $565,210 under the terms shown in the submission. Commissioners said they will take time to review the full proposal before taking action.

Why it matters: solid-waste hauling is a recurring county expense funded in the operating budget; a multi-year contract with the proposed escalators would increase annual costs materially unless the commission negotiates different terms or identifies offsetting budget changes.

Public commenters and commission discussion focused on three recurring questions: whether the bid reflects the same pickup schedule and service levels currently provided, whether the county’s FY2026 budget can absorb the first-year increase, and whether the five-year escalator should be negotiated. Tony Wickham, a local resident who spoke during public comment, urged proactive public updates around infrastructure projects and asked the county to publish timelines and progress reports for residents; he warned that clearer communication would help reduce confusion about service changes and costs.

Commissioners noted the RFP did not break down per-site pickup days or address the schedule in the bid packet and said those are items they can negotiate. Several meeting attendees urged the county to question the 5% annual escalator as part of contract negotiations, arguing inflation and fuel-cost assumptions could make a smaller annual adjustment appropriate.

No formal award or contract decision was made at the Feb. 25 meeting. Commissioners said staff would distribute the bid documents for review and return to the commission with recommendations and cost breakdowns before committing to a contract.

What’s next: the commission will review the proposal details and the fiscal implications for FY2026 and future budgets before voting on any contract. The county indicated staff would provide copies of the bid to commissioners and negotiate service, schedule and pricing details if they move to contract discussions.