Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
De Pere License Committee approves minutes and multiple liquor licenses
Summary
The De Pere License Committee approved the May 19 minutes and voted to approve a slate of fermented malt beverage and intoxicating liquor license applicants on June 2; no public comments were received and all motions carried by voice vote of those present.
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The De Pere License Committee on June 2 approved the minutes of its May 19 meeting and voted to grant multiple fermented malt beverage and intoxicating liquor licenses.
Chair called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and asked Clerk Carrie to take roll; Alderperson Gents and Alderperson Pierock were recorded present and Alderperson Phil was excused. The chair opened the public comment period, citing Section 6-3F of the DPMC, and said no one was in the room or online to comment.
Under new business the committee first moved to approve the May 19 minutes. "I make a motion to approve," the chair said; another member seconded and the motion carried after a voice vote of those present. The committee then considered license applications across several categories. The chair moved to approve one Class A fermented malt beverage applicant and to approve eight Class A intoxicating liquor applicants (numbered one through eight on the agenda); Alderperson Pierock seconded both motions and each carried on a voice vote. The committee also approved two Class B fermented malt beverage/Class C wine applicants and a set of Class B fermented malt beverage/Class B intoxicating liquor applicants listed one through ten on the agenda, again on motions moved by the chair and seconded by Alderperson Pierock.
The chair's announcements closed with a call for future agenda items (none were offered) and a motion to adjourn, which passed by voice vote. The meeting adjourned following the votes.
Details recorded in the meeting transcript show repeated voice votes of 'I' from members present; individual roll-call vote tallies by name were not supplied in the record.

