Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procedural Continuance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hearing for 116 North Crest continued after required mailed notices were not produced
Summary
A hearing on case 25‑15 (116 North Crest Avenue) was continued and will be republished because required mailed notices were not available at the meeting; the commission unanimously approved a motion to continue.
The commission continued the public hearing for Case 25‑15 (116 North Crest Avenue) after staff and petitioners confirmed the required mailed notices were not available at the meeting.
When asked for the mailings and the yard sign receipts, petitioners and staff reported they did not have the green mail receipts that demonstrate notice had been mailed. Chair and staff explained that without those mailings the hearing could not proceed and that the item needed to be republished. A motion to continue the hearing to the commission's first available date was made by John Maso, seconded by George Kiel, and the roll call vote was unanimous in favor. Staff advised the petitioners they will receive information about the republished hearing date and apologized for the administrative oversight.
The continuance was procedural: no project merits or objections were decided at this meeting and the commission recorded no substantive testimony for the record on Case 25‑15.
