Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Art Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
K–12 art curriculum reorganized; teachers highlight skills progression and AI concerns
Summary
Art coordinators described a K–12 rewrite that groups elementary grades for manageability, adds reflection and clearer rubrics at the high-school level, and flags generative AI as an emerging classroom issue.
Bill Summer, the district K–12 art coordinator, and Katrina Anglehart, who teaches elementary and high-school art, presented a comprehensive rewrite of the art curriculum that reorders elementary instruction into manageable grade bands, revises rubrics, and strengthens reflection and skill progression.
To make K–5 delivery more sustainable, presenters described grouping grade levels into an A/B rotation: pre-K, K–1, 2–3 and 4–5 so elementary art teachers can plan materials and instruction for multiple grade levels while maintaining consistent learning objectives. "Our goal is to ensure that each child continues to have meaningful opportunities and explore their creativity, build their artistic skills, and develop that lifelong appreciation for the arts," Anglehart said.
At the high-school level, Summer described new unit framing and more specific rubrics that incorporate the district's profile-of-a-graduate goals. He said one major change was to make multi-week skills progressions explicit (for example, wheel-throwing skills in ceramics taught across the course rather than squeezed into a single unit).
Presenters also discussed generative AI as a growing classroom question — teachers reported students are already raising concerns about how AI affects artistic identity and career choices. The district said it will continue to monitor how generative tools interact with instruction while emphasizing authentic student work and reflection.
No formal board vote was recorded in the transcript; presenters said rubric rollout and teacher PD will continue.
