Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transparency Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Georgia State Election Board on transparency, fundraising and conflicts of interest
Summary
Dozens of attendees urged clearer recusal rules and disclosure after a board member sent a letter to the EAC that commenters say claimed to represent the board without a vote; speakers also criticized anonymous donations to a legal defense fund and urged referral to ethics authorities.
Public comment at the Georgia State Election Board meeting focused heavily on transparency, conflicts of interest and the handling of correspondence in the board’s name.
Multiple speakers, including Andres Par of Common Cause Georgia and Rachel Glover of ACLU Georgia, said a recent letter submitted to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission opened with the phrase "The Georgia State Election Board endorses the proposal" despite no recorded public vote. They argued that such correspondence should be subject to public deliberation and that unilateral communications erode public trust.
Speakers also raised concerns about a legal‑defense fundraising effort for a board member and asked the board to adopt clear recusal and disclosure procedures under state ethics law, citing OCGA 45‑10‑6. Several commenters urged the board to refer alleged violations for independent review and recommended that the board publish rules for advanced public notice of agenda items.
Responding at the meeting, a board member said the letter had been sent in a personal capacity, while the board agreed to consider guidance on disclosures and to discuss investigatory procedures and case materials ahead of the December meeting. The executive director said investigators were not scheduled to attend board meetings going forward and that the board would seek timely delivery of case files for review.
The public’s comments linked two themes: a request for procedural changes to ensure board‑level decisions are made in public, and a demand for clearer conflict‑of‑interest rules when outside fundraising or undisclosed donations are involved. Speakers requested that the board adopt formal recusal and disclosure policies and consider referring matters to the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission for review.
