Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Submittals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weddington planning board reviews revised subdivision submittal rules, debates septic documentation
Summary
At its July 28 meeting, the Weddington Town Planning Board reviewed proposed revisions to Appendix 2B (submittal requirements) with focused debate on language requiring agency-reviewed septic documentation; a public commenter urged retaining explicit Union County approval language and staff proposed requiring agency-recognized evidence rather than board interpretation.
WEDDINGTON TOWN — The Weddington Town Planning Board on July 28 reviewed changes to Appendix 2B, the town's checklist of materials required for subdivision schematic or sketch plans, with discussion centering on how to document septic systems for conditional zoning approvals.
A public commenter, Chad, urged the board to restore language in row 51 that the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) require Union County Environmental Health approval of proposed lots for septic systems or the use of the county's notice-of-intent (NOI) common form. "Not having the approval is like a college accepting a GPA without providing the transcript to prove that the work was done," Chad said, arguing that without a submitted approval the town would be relying on a developer's word and could face layout changes that ripple through stormwater, cul-de-sac lengths and tree requirements.
Staff presented the revised Appendix 2B drafted after a May overhaul and subsequent subcommittee work. The presenter said the prior language was ambiguous about whether the planning board should interpret raw septic delineations or require evidence that an appropriate external agency had already reviewed and accepted the information. "We're not only saying that you need to provide the information we're looking for. You need to provide it in the form that an appropriate agency has recognized and has already reviewed," the staff member said, describing the revised wording to include "associated infrastructure with approved improvement permits or public sewer lines, if applicable."
Board members and staff emphasized the goal of giving the town council clear, verifiable materials so the council knows what it is voting on in conditional zoning cases. Staff also said a subcommittee met on the item and that a committee member (identified in the record as Mr. Deer) provided a revised draft by email clarifying what "delineation" means for the town's purposes.
Separately, the board moved to table text amendment 202505 (section D917CA) indefinitely, a step staff said reflected the board's previous decision not to support that proposal; the motion was seconded and approved by unanimous voice vote.
The board's next steps include reviewing the subcommittee's revised language for Appendix 2B and recommending a final version to the town council. No final council action was recorded in the planning board's meeting transcript.
