Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board of Adjustment tables variance request for accessory structure at 4222 Antioch Church Road

Weddington Town Board of Adjustment · June 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Weddington’s Board of Adjustment on June 23 tabled an application requesting a variance for an accessory structure at 4222 Antioch Church Road after staff and board members found the submission incomplete; the matter was moved to the July 28 planning board meeting to allow the applicant to supply a survey, septic information and a hardship statement.

The Weddington Town Board of Adjustment voted on June 23 to table an application requesting a variance from UDO section D917DM.1B4 for an accessory structure at 4222 Antioch Church Road to the July 28 planning board meeting, giving the applicant 30 days to provide a complete application and supporting survey information.

Board members and staff said the application as submitted lacked required details, including a clear statement of the UDO section at issue, a factual survey showing building and property dimensions, the location of the septic field, and a statement explaining the hardship that would justify a variance. A staff member told the board the filing was effectively a builder plot plan and not an accurate survey and recommended the applicant return with a corrected submission.

The applicant told the board he was inexperienced with the variance process and provided his property address for the record: “My address is 4222 Antioch Church Road,” (Applicant). He said he wanted to build a pool house but was unsure how to complete the application and had not included the required detail; board members and a surveyor recommended he consult the town planner, obtain an accurate survey showing setbacks and septic location, and consider legal counsel if necessary because this is a quasi‑judicial proceeding.

A board member moved to table the matter to the July 28 planning board meeting to allow the applicant time to revise and supplement the submission; another member seconded the motion and the board approved the tabling. The chair confirmed the new date as July 28 at 6 p.m. The meeting adjourned following that vote.

What happens next: the applicant is expected to work with the town planner and provide a corrected application packet with a survey and evidence of any hardship claimed. If the board’s eventual decision is appealed, that appeal would proceed to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, a board member noted during the hearing.

Reported authorities and references from the hearing include the cited UDO section D917DM.1B4 (accessory uses and relative location to adjacent rights-of-way) and a general reference to state law requiring allowance for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) raised during discussion. The board recorded the tabling action to the July 28 planning board meeting at 6:00 p.m.