Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident complains of pickleball noise and safety issues; annexation supporters emphasize infrastructure and cost reimbursement
Summary
During public comment a resident urged action to reduce pickleball noise and alleged public‑nuisance behavior at Rainier Trails Park; other speakers supported the Tarragon annexation, citing utility extension, redundancy and an offer to reimburse city review costs.
A resident who identified herself as Sharon told the council May 11 that pickleball play at Rainier Trails Park has created persistent noise and neighborhood disturbance and alleged instances of public urination and defecation near property lines. "This debate about pickleball is not silly," Sharon said in public comment, invoking a state public‑nuisance statute. She described the noise as repeated, intrusive strokes and said the activity interferes with neighbors' peace and with survivors of violence who she said are re‑traumatized by the sound.
Mayor noted that the city installed a sanitary can at Rainier Trails Park after a resident provided video evidence; the mayor said the delivery was ordered by the executive office to prevent further exposures and stressed that the action was taken by the executive branch without separate budget approval.
Also during public comment, Alex Campbell, an area resident, and a representative for the Tarragon applicant (identifying as Chappardew) spoke in favor of Tarragon’s annexation petition. Campbell emphasized the opportunity to extend stubbed utilities and roadways and to improve redundancy in the network. Chappardew reiterated points in the applicant’s packet and highlighted a fiscal projection included in the materials: "By connecting to stubbed infrastructure near the subject property, the city... can expect to bring in over $32,000 per unit in revenue. That would equate to an estimated $2,000,000 overall," the applicant representative stated. The applicant also offered to reimburse city review costs or pay consultant fees to reduce staff burden if the council moved forward.
Trip Hart of Friends of Boise Creek invited the public to a Creekside gathering May 16 and described volunteer restoration work along Boise Creek and partnerships with King County and other local groups.
What’s next: council took no immediate enforcement action on the park allegations during the meeting. Annexation petitions will continue through staff review and, where council approved a petition, staff will prepare boundary‑review filings and notifications.
