Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Village Burial Ground topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clerk says GPR, restoration and kiosks planned for Village Burial Ground; mass-grave possibility flagged
Summary
Ashland Historical Commission heard an update from Clerk Helen Nickole that Bridgewater State University is expected to return in July–August for GPR work; the commission plans site prep, erosion control, headstone restoration and kiosks, and discussed how to address a potential mass grave.
The Ashland Historical Commission on April 14 heard detailed plans for a ground-penetrating radar (GPR) survey and restoration work at the Village Burial Ground. Clerk Helen Nickole told the commission the working group had met with Bridgewater State University and that "it seems like they plan on returning in the July/August time frame." She said landscape contractors will prepare the site for the GPR survey, erosion-control measures are being explored, and headstone restoration is pending delivery of dense-grade gravel.
Why it matters: The Village Burial Ground project seeks to map unmarked graves and stabilize features before heavier restoration; commissioners said the work will inform commemoration and conservation choices. Nickole said the commission also plans to install two kiosks—one with historical information and one intended as a memorial for persons buried without markers—and to include a marker with a QR code linking to additional records.
Commission discussion centered on next steps if the GPR or fieldwork suggests a mass burial of paupers, enslaved people, or Indigenous individuals. Nickole said the restoration team would prepare monuments and landscaping after the GPR results; Curtiss Hoffman agreed to connect the commission with "the correct resources" if archaeological or forensic guidance is needed. The commission did not authorize excavation; members emphasized following professional archaeological practice and state review processes before any invasive work.
The commission recorded no public attendees. Members set follow-up tasks including site prep for the survey and outreach materials for the proposed kiosks; timing depends on the university’s return and delivery of materials.
