Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Civic Symbolism topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Einstein Middle School students urge council to explore a new Shoreline city flag

Shoreline City Council · May 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Students from Einstein Middle School presented four flag designs and urged the Shoreline City Council to launch a community‑led flag redesign process; the teacher and councilors favored a public process informed by students and community input.

A group of Einstein Middle School students presented four original flag designs to the Shoreline City Council on May 18 and asked the council to formally explore a community‑driven redesign of the city flag.

Brent Holland, an art teacher at Einstein Middle School, introduced the students and said the school’s project asked whether Shoreline has a flag and whether it represents residents. ‘‘A flag is the most public piece of art that the city owns,’’ Holland told the council, arguing a well‑designed flag can foster civic pride and identity.

Four students took turns explaining their entries. Amelia said her design highlights Shoreline’s connection to water and honors local Native tribes; Alex Pudick’s flag uses a 14‑point star to represent the city’s neighborhoods and waterfronts; Cooper emphasized parks and the region’s indigenous peoples; Simon included mountains and a six‑pointed motif representing local waterways. Each student described the symbolism and why it, in their view, represents Shoreline.

Councilors responded positively and recommended a broader community process. Council member Roberts praised the designs as ‘‘everything that good flag design should be’’ and recommended a community‑wide process so the final flag represents the whole city. Council member Adamasu supported a student‑led element paired with staff oversight. Council member Scully noted a potential recusal if a future decision directly affected a council member’s family and asked staff to note that conflict.

Holland asked the council to consider several possible next steps: directing staff to study options, forming a small work group, or opening a public design process that would include student and community voices.

The presentation concluded without a formal council vote; councilors said they would consider how to move forward with a community engagement plan and next steps for staff.

The flag discussion followed public comment and the consent calendar and preceded other study items on the agenda.