Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Longview panel outlines aging infrastructure, coordination and why planners and engineers sometimes clash

Longview City · May 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Longview City engineers, planners and stormwater staff described the city’s aging infrastructure, how departments coordinate review and why technical reviews, SEPA, and interagency checks matter; they highlighted projects and process changes designed to speed and improve outcomes.

At Longview 101, city engineers and planners described major infrastructure challenges, how review and permitting work, and what success looks like from their perspectives.

Sam Barham, city engineer, said engineering work is split across customer service, capital projects and development review. He described a capital program example in which staff discovered a failing 72‑inch storm pipe while designing a $4,000,000 park project; staff paused the park design, designed a stormwater replacement project, and secured grant and loan funding to address the pipe before proceeding.

Morgan Palmer, senior engineer, said Longview’s biggest infrastructure challenge is age: "a lot of our stuff is a 100 years old." He described pavement and pipes having finite useful lives and emphasized balancing budget, schedule and scope when delivering capital work. Palmer outlined Vision Zero traffic safety goals and ongoing efforts to improve crossings, curb ramps and intersection safety.

Steve Hobner, stormwater manager, explained the programmatic work required under state permits — inspections, plan reviews, construction inspection and public education — and the city’s close coordination with the Consolidated Diking Improvement District (CDID) that operates pumps and levees protecting much of the city.

Irene Urikanga described the internal technical review process and public notice practice: projects are routed to relevant departments, staff prepare a staff report documenting how the project meets code, property owners within 300 feet are notified (often staff over‑notify) and SEPA or traffic reviews can prompt outside agency comments such as from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT).

Nick Little said common causes of delay are incomplete or flawed applications; he emphasized pre‑application meetings as a tool to identify red flags early and speed permitting. Little noted updates to the shared driveway and short subdivision ordinances that allow different subdivision types and can streamline smaller projects.

Panelists encouraged residents to use the city’s "Ask Longview" portal to report issues and said neighborhood notice and public engagement matter in shaping outcomes. They closed by answering audience questions on industrial land, roundabouts and where future projects are likely to arise.