Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond Campaign topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orange County bond committee reviews campaign messaging, timeline and tax FAQ
Summary
At a Sept. 4 meeting, the Orange County Bond Education Committee heard consultants from Avenir Bold on messaging and paid‑media plans, discussed how long debt and taxes would remain on county books, and considered messaging if the school bond fails.
The Orange County Bond Education Committee met Sept. 4 at the Bonnie B. Davis Agricultural Center to review messaging and outreach plans for a proposed school bond and to clarify how long any tax increase and borrowing would remain in effect.
Co‑Chairs Commissioners Jean Hamilton and Phyllis Portie‑Ascott opened the meeting and the committee approved draft minutes from July 25, Aug. 20 and Aug. 28 on a motion from Al Ciarochi, seconded by Sarah Smylie.
Consultants from Avenir Bold presented a key message matrix that mapped target audiences to tailored messages. Ty Howard went over audience segments, Karen Howell described those audiences’ media habits, and Scott Scaggs proposed themes, imagery and language to use in outreach. Howell said paid media would be used to steer residents to a campaign microsite and reviewed a draft paid‑media timeline. Jan Johnson presented a timeline of deliverables for outreach and media activity.
Committee members pressed staff on the mechanics and duration of borrowing. “We would not borrow money well in advance of using it,” County staff member Travis Myren said, explaining the county plans to time borrowing to need. County finance staff Kirk Vaughn said the county typically borrows over 20 years, noted that bond proceeds must be spent within seven years, and said the related debt could remain on the county’s books for as long as 30 years.
Committee members and staff also discussed how to explain to voters what would happen if the bond failed. Jan Johnson asked, “what happens if the bond doesn’t pass?” Sarah Smylie said the county would be left to “resort to expensive band‑aids” rather than make comprehensive improvements. Benjamin Alschuler added that failure would likely force smaller, ad hoc repairs that could be costlier because of interest rates. County staff Kevin Smith said prior campaigns emphasized the relative value of bond‑funded school investment versus other county facilities, calling it “the most bang for the buck in that regard.”
The committee directed Avenir Bold and staff to incorporate the tax‑timing FAQ and contingency messaging into campaign materials and FAQs. Co‑chairs reminded members of upcoming meetings scheduled for Sept. 18, Oct. 2, Oct. 16 and Oct. 30; the committee adjourned at 7:28 p.m.
Next steps: consultants will finalize the paid‑media timeline and FAQ language for committee review at forthcoming meetings.
