Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Handbook Updates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

School committee tables final vote on updated student handbooks after debate over recess and reporting requirements

Medford School Committee · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee discussed handbook updates covering elementary recess protections, an academic dishonesty appeals panel, bus surveillance with vendor Eastern Bus, and limits on AI for grading; members asked for clearer language and reporting requirements and voted to table final approval pending edits.

The Medford School Committee on June 8 reviewed proposed updates to district student handbooks that would explicitly protect elementary recess, clarify an academic-dishonesty appeals panel, add transportation expectations (including audio/video on Eastern Bus vehicles), and set limits on educator use of generative artificial intelligence.

Superintendent Dr. Suzanne Galusi said the revisions align handbook language across schools and incorporate feedback from principals and the teachers union. She described an agreement to redistribute professional development time for the 2026–27 calendar year as part of related planning. “All four elementary schools are responsive classroom schools,” Galusi said, and the handbook now states that recess “will not be withheld as disciplinary measure for anything other than direct logical consequence for an unsafe body.”

Members raised concerns about the breadth of discretion available to building administrators and asked for an administrative reporting requirement to ensure consistency. Member Russo pressed for records when recess is withheld, asking that the district log incidents and notify families so patterns can be monitored. "Something needs to be written up explaining why recess was taken away, perhaps sent home to the parent, as well as sent to the main office," a member said during the discussion.

Board members also discussed the composition of the academic-dishonesty panel and whether the teacher on that panel should be different from the teacher involved in the initial determination. Superintendent Galusi said the panel is intended as a neutral appeals body and agreed to clarify language so the panel includes a teacher not involved in the original incident.

The handbook additions name Eastern Bus as the district's vendor and note that some buses are equipped with video and audio recording. Members asked staff to clarify how surveillance will be handled and to provide contact details for transportation.

On generative AI, Member Reinfeld proposed a clarification that educators should not use AI tools to provide grades or assign grades; the superintendent said that guidance would be added.

After extended discussion and requests for clarifying edits, Member Rousseau moved to table final action until the next meeting so staff can incorporate the requested changes; the motion carried. No final handbook vote or ordinance was adopted at the meeting.